This website will offer limited functionality in this browser. We only support the recent versions of major browsers like Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge.

ISG S&OP Series | Episode 4 – Supply Chain Technology: Complexity vs Confidence

View Full Video Script

4:28 min
  1. Hi, I'm Robert Kugel, executive director with ISG.

  2. Thank you for joining us today.

  3. We're gonna be discussing data complexity

  4. and the challenges that go with that, with David Marmer,

  5. senior Vice President from board.

  6. Hi David. Great to have you join the conversation today.

  7. Hey Robert. Thanks for having me. Appreciate it.

  8. ISGs research identified product

  9. and process complexity as well as data silos, as major

  10. barriers for companies in managing their supply chains.

  11. For example, the research found

  12. that supplier complexity is common.

  13. 81% of companies have more than a hundred suppliers.

  14. 42% have more than a thousand.

  15. And as for products, 79% have more than a thousand SKUs.

  16. And data for its part is scattered between systems

  17. and often only kept in spreadsheets.

  18. So, David, given that, how should companies begin

  19. to address these challenges

  20. and what's possible with today's technologies?

  21. So, that's a great point. So I'm gonna start

  22. by just bringing onto

  23. what I think is a fairly familiar pain point.

  24. Uh, refer to it as integration debt Over time,

  25. many organizations just accumulate

  26. dozens of disconnected systems.

  27. They may have one for demand, they'll have another one

  28. for supply and another one for finance.

  29. And each of these need constant maintenance

  30. and frankly, manual data reconciliation.

  31. Uh, and the integration debt is this hidden cost

  32. of the complexity that they've created.

  33. It drags, um, and slows down the business

  34. and the ability to really respond

  35. and make any meaningful change.

  36. And it shows up as inconsistent data.

  37. It shows up as redundant processes

  38. and endless it projects just to try

  39. to keep the systems talking to each other.

  40. And in today's volatile supply chain, that kind

  41. of friction can be the difference between agility and chaos.

  42. And so when we think about the type of systems that need

  43. to be in place, um, I, I think

  44. that the answer really lies in the idea

  45. of a unified planning model.

  46. And that's what the technology of today can bring.

  47. A single integrated environment that connects all the layers

  48. of planning, demand, supply, and finance.

  49. Instead of stitching together data

  50. through custom integrations, uh,

  51. they model everything really in one place

  52. where all assumptions, all forecasts,

  53. all key performance indicators stay synchronized.

  54. And this eliminates the need for

  55. that manual reconciliation I spoke about earlier

  56. and builds a foundation for true end-to-end visibility.

  57. And it's not just about connecting systems,

  58. it's about aligning the entire organization

  59. and how the plans are executed.

  60. So David, what's the first thing you recommend

  61. that organizations do to begin

  62. to address the challenges of complexity?

  63. Yeah. And so this is an important part

  64. of understanding how to get started.

  65. So I think the first thing that companies really need

  66. to look at organizations need to look at is

  67. to access their integration landscape.

  68. Um, you know, what are the biggest bottlenecks

  69. and where do the redundancies exist?

  70. 'cause as you mentioned, with all the spreadsheets

  71. that exist, there's guaranteed to be redundancies there.

  72. Second, they should prioritize the highest impact use cases

  73. they wanna focus on, like demand and supply chain alignment

  74. or sales and operations planning,

  75. where this integration debt is causing the most pain.

  76. And third, they should adopt a more unified data model

  77. and really start to harmonize, uh,

  78. and look at the master data

  79. so everyone can be speaking the same language.

  80. And then last I'd say is they want to, they,

  81. they should be really thinking about implementing

  82. iteratively, right?

  83. Move one business unit as a time

  84. or one process at a time into the unified model.

  85. Otherwise they risk things getting out of control again.

  86. And finally, they need to embed

  87. some level of governance over this.

  88. Someone has to define ownership for the planning data

  89. and then keep the business

  90. and the IT organization aligned

  91. as the systems evolve over time.

  92. Great. Well, thank you David,

  93. for your perspective and insights.

  94. I really enjoyed our conversation.

  95. Well, thank you Robert. I appreciate it. Thank you.

  96. Thanks again for joining us.

  97. We invite you to listen to our other experts from board in

  98. this series on unified continuous planning for supply chain.

  99. We are confident that you'll find them informative

  100. and well worth your time.

ISG S&OP Series | Episode 4 – Supply Chain Technology: Complexity vs Confidence

Watch Episode 5: Integrated Business Planning and AI, The Confidence Multiplier

The issue isn’t your planning tools.
It’s making them work as one.

You can add tools for forecasting, optimization, visibility, and analytics. But when data, workflows, and ownership are split across systems, planning becomes stitching things together instead of making decisions.

If any of this feels familiar, your disconnected planning landscape is likely slowing decisions:

  1. Planning depends on manual handoffs and spreadsheets between systems
  2. Teams spend more time reconciling data than evaluating trade-offs
  3. Changes take too long because every adjustment breaks something downstream
  4. “Single source of truth” exists in theory, not in practice
  5. IT becomes a bottleneck for planning change and innovation

More tools won’t fix this. A connected, aligned planning architecture will.

What you’ll learn:

  • Why disconnected planning tools increase decision latency and reduce trust in outputs
  • What connected planning architecture looks like across functions
  • How leading teams reduce fragmentation without losing capability

Featuring:

Robert Kugel, ISG (Executive Director):
highlights why supply chain technology fragmentation increasingly undermines speed, alignment, and trust in the plan.

David Marmer, Board (Chief Product Officer):
explains how leading organizations connect planning capabilities into one coherent system that enables decisions at scale.

Next episode:

Episode 5: Integrated Business Planning and AI, The Confidence Multiplier

Or explore the series:

Episode 1: The Missing Orchestrator
Episode 2: Demand Planning, From Forecast to Foresight
Episode 3: Supply Planning, Making Continuous Real