This website will offer limited functionality in this browser. We only support the recent versions of major browsers like Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge.
AI Customer Stories: Real-World Examples in Finance and Operations Planning
Board customers across finance and operations are putting AI to work on specific planning and analysis workflows to cut manual work, speed up analysis, and make faster, better-informed decisions.
Board customers across finance and operations are putting AI to work on specific planning and analysis workflows to cut manual work, speed up analysis, and make faster, better-informed decisions. This page collects their stories — with the specific tools, workflows, and outcomes involved.
Forecast accuracy within 2% of actuals; $10M+ in savings; $1.3M safety-stock reduction per 1-point accuracy gain
AI in enterprise planning is moving from potential to practice
Finance and operations teams are past the “what could AI do” conversation. Below are real, named organizations already using or exploring Board’s agentic and analytical AI for variance analysis, reconciliation, forecasting, and demand planning. What these examples have in common is not simply the use of AI. They show where AI becomes useful in enterprise planning: when it is applied to a defined business workflow, grounded in trusted planning context and governed data.
Why organizations use Board AI for planning
General-purpose AI can make information easier to access and analyze. Enterprise planning adds another requirement: AI needs to understand the business context behind the numbers, including planning hierarchies, scenarios, versions, calculations, assumptions, and permissions.
Board AI operates within that governed planning context. This helps finance and operational teams apply AI to specific workflows such as variance investigation, reconciliation, forecasting, and exception management while retaining human oversight and traceability.
Three characteristics show up repeatedly across these customer stories:
Grounded in planning context. Board Agents operate using governed planning data, business definitions, hierarchies, calculations, and user context, empowering users to work with the same business structures they already use for planning and reporting.
Built for governed, auditable decisions. Transparency, explainability, and human oversight are part of the workflow, which matters in finance and accounting contexts where an ungoverned answer is a liability, not a convenience. Users can inspect the Board datasets behind an answer, challenge the analysis, and validate the output before acting. As Karndean’s Group Finance Director Chris Brown put it: “I can always ask the Board Agent where an answer came from. If it tells me my margins are strong, I can ask why, and it’ll show me its reasoning.”
Different forms of AI for different planning problems. Board Agents support domain-specific analysis and use case driven workflows, while Board Foresight and Signals bring predictive and external economic intelligence into forecasting and operational planning. Together, they support Continuous Planning across finance and operations.
AI in the Office of Finance
Across the Office of Finance, Board customers are exploring how persona-based AI agents complement finance expertise.
The Board FP&A Agent supports planning, forecasting, and performance analysis. The Board Controller Agent brings accounting-aware intelligence to financial close, consolidation, reconciliation, and reporting.
These agents are designed to accelerate analysis and support decision-making inside governed planning workflows, while keeping finance professionals responsible for validation, judgment, and approval.
Together, they help finance teams move from gathering and validating information toward understanding performance and shaping decisions.
Chiesi: identifying variance drivers in seconds instead of hours
At Chiesi, the Board FP&A Agent helped to accelerate financial variance analysis and uncover the drivers behind performance changes. Instead of spending hours investigating discrepancies across the P&L, balance sheet, products, SKUs, and regions, the FP&A team gets root causes and answers in seconds — supporting a shift from reactive reporting toward proactive planning.
An important benefit identified is the efficiency of Board Agents. Tasks that previously required manual preparation in Excel can now be executed directly within Board, providing ready-to-use tables and charts in minutes without data export or pivot table creation.
Riccardo Filippi
Finance Application Manager, Global Finance Chiesi Farmaceutici
AI proof point: AI-powered variance analysis and root-cause identification are cutting financial performance analysis from hours to seconds.
Watch how Chiesi uses the Board FP&A agent:
Sorry, this video can’t be played right now. Please try again later.
EBSCO Industries: reducing manual analysis and eliminating Excel exports
EBSCO Industries explored the Board FP&A Agent for ad hoc financial analysis through natural-language interaction, removing the need to repeatedly export data into Excel.
The team gets contextual answers, understands the calculations behind them, explores financial information while retaining transparency and auditability, and the ability to validate the underlying data sources — freeing up time to evaluate what the numbers mean for the business rather than assembling them.
What impresses me most is the Board FP&A Agent’s ability to triangulate. It takes our detailed balance sheet and income statement and synthesizes everything into clear, actionable insights — incredibly valuable for us at EBSCO.
Adam Hancock
former Vice President, Financial Planning & Analysis EBSCO Industries
AI proof point: Natural-language financial analysis is reducing manual Excel exports and speeding up ad hoc insights, with transparent calculations throughout.
Watch how EBSCO Industries uses the Board FP&A Agent:
Sorry, this video can’t be played right now. Please try again later.
AMMEGA: accelerating analysis and reducing reconciliation work
AMMEGA is exploring multiple applications of Board AI across finance. The Board FP&A Agent automates manual sanity checks, accelerates financial analysis, and lets the team interact with trusted data through natural language — spending less time finding issues and more time resolving them.
In a separate finance workflow, AMMEGA reduced manual reconciliation work from almost a full day to one or two hours, alongside improved data quality, less dependence on IT support, and transparent, explainable answers.
Running the same query across multiple entities and instantly seeing the top variances is exactly the relief we needed.
Deborah Clothier
Finance Director, Commercial Business Finance APAC AMMEGA
AI proof points:
Manual reconciliation reduced from almost one day to one or two hours
Automated sanity checks and faster variance analysis
Karndean: turning consolidation investigation into a single question
Karndean is piloting Board Agents for the Office of Finance — including the Board Controller Agent — to move from reporting to investigation faster during financial consolidation. Rather than simply returning data, the agent highlights unusual balances, such as a receivables provision that looks low compared to other entities, identifies which entity is driving a variance, and explains why a balance may need attention. Karndean’s Group Finance Director can also challenge the analysis and ask where a conclusion came from, rather than treating the output as a black box.
Chasing down an intercompany variance used to mean report after report, drilling in a little further each time. Now I just ask one question, and the Board Controller Agent zeroes straight in.
Chris Brown
Group Finance DirectorKarndean
AI proof points:
Exception flagging — for example, a receivables provision that looks low relative to peer entities
Intercompany variance investigation reduced from report-after-report to a single question
Transparent reasoning: Chris can ask the agent where an answer came from
Finance leaders can use natural-language interaction to investigate governed planning data without repeatedly building additional reports
Board Agent analysis is clear enough to hand directly to the CEO for self-service questions
Listen to Chris Brown from Karndean:
Sorry, this video can’t be played right now. Please try again later.
Diersch & Schröder Group is exploring how natural-language interaction and AI-supported analysis can help controllers work with existing reports and financial data — identifying positive and negative variances, analyzing results across segments and periods, and investigating potential performance drivers at account level. This is an early example of AI making management information easier to explore, and helping controllers move faster from reported results to potential explanations.
We quickly saw the potential of Board Agent and learned how to tailor the prompts to our reporting priorities. It has become a genuinely valued member of the team, and we are excited about what comes next.
Katja Makiol
Head of Group ControllingDiersch & Schröder Group
AI proof point: Natural-language management analysis is helping controllers move faster across variances, periods, segments, and accounts.
Watch the video interview with Katja Makiol from DS Group:
Sorry, this video can’t be played right now. Please try again later.
Board AI in planning extends beyond agentic AI. Board Foresight applies analytical AI and econometric modeling to forecasting, while Board Signals brings relevant external economic and market intelligence into the planning process.
Rocky Brands: external signals and GenAI explainability in demand planning
Rocky Brands uses Board for Demand Planning together with Board Foresight and Signals to plan in a volatile footwear market. The organization reduced data preparation time by 80–90% and moved from static monthly forecasting to continuous, signal-driven planning. External indicators validate forecasts in near real time, supporting faster reforecasting and more granular visibility at SKU and customer level. GenAI explainability helps planners interpret the relationships behind forecasts and external indicators — supporting more confident inventory and supply commitments while keeping people responsible for the material decisions.
Planning shifted from data preparation to exception management.
Michael Harper
VP Supply Chain PlanningRocky Brands
AI proof points:
Data preparation reduced by 80–90%
External signals used to validate demand forecasts
GenAI-supported interpretation and explainability
Faster reforecasting and more granular inventory decisions
Continuous, signal-driven planning
Watch how Rocky Brands uses Board Foresight:
Sorry, this video can’t be played right now. Please try again later.
Kraft Heinz: grounding go-to-market planning in macroeconomic intelligence
Kraft Heinz uses Board Foresight and Board Signals to bring macroeconomic intelligence into forecasting and go-to-market planning, helping the team see through pandemic-driven consumer behavior shifts and market volatility rather than relying on historical trend lines alone. The approach started as a pilot and has since expanded to Canada and more than 80 international territories, with Kraft Heinz noting that even a 1% improvement in forecast accuracy translates into millions of dollars in cost savings or revenue growth.
All retailers and CPGs should consider macroeconomic factors to improve their business planning. Not only will forecasting accuracy improve but go to-market planners will be fully educated as to what external factors are important to their markets.
Jac Connolly
Senior EconomistThe Kraft Heinz Company
AI proof point: Macroeconomic-intelligence-driven forecasting scaled from an initial pilot to Canada and 80+ international territories.
Whataburger: one foundation for sales, wage, and staffing forecasts
Whataburger uses Board Foresight as the base model for its sales, wage, and staffing forecasts — layering business-specific adjustments on top rather than relying on incomplete historical data alone. The team built 20 short-term (1–12 month) predictive models covering topline sales and regional performance across corporate and franchised restaurants, and uses the same forecasting foundation to inform HR decisions on staffing, cost, and retention.
We fully embrace Board Foresight as our base model, and then we layer on some adjustments on top of that. Now, the Board Foresight forecast is really how we start off our planning process.
Pete Valadez
Senior Director, FP&AWhataburger
AI proof point: Store-level sales forecasts accurate within a 1–2% error margin across 20 predictive models spanning sales, staffing, and wage planning — a rare example of one forecasting foundation supporting both commercial and workforce decisions.
Kimberly-Clark: turning forecasting from a reporting exercise into a decision advantage
At Kimberly-Clark, the value of AI-driven forecasting extends beyond improving the forecast itself. The resulting forecast now informs decisions across finance, demand planning, supply chain, marketing, and revenue growth management.
Forecasting had been a backward-looking, Excel-based process built on linear trend lines and manual judgment overlays — hard to standardize across categories and difficult to explain to stakeholders, and fragile when the pandemic, inflation shocks, and private-label surges hit.
Since partnering with Board in 2023, the team has rebuilt category forecasting around an econometric, external-data-first methodology: one standardized framework applied consistently across categories while allowing each category’s own drivers reflect its specific market.
Machine learning continuously evaluating millions of external signals — economic, retail, consumer, and competitive data — to identify what statistically drives demand, removing human bias from driver selection. Every forecast now comes with an explainable “driver story” instead of just a number, and feeds directly into finance (budgeting, investor guidance), demand planning and supply chain (inventory, service levels), and marketing and revenue growth management (campaign timing, pricing).
The goal was never just a better number. The goal was a better decision.
Misty Alexander
Director Consumer AnalyticsKimberly-Clark
AI proof points:
Forecast accuracy within 2% of actuals overall (as tight as 0.2–2% in the facial tissue category)
More than $10 million in realized savings, including $1.3 million in safety-stock reduction for every one-percentage-point improvement in forecast accuracy
Quarterly forecasts now outperform annual forecasts in 7 of 11 categories, and are at parity in the other 2
One forecast now feeds finance, demand planning/supply chain, and marketing/RGM decisions, instead of sitting in a single team’s spreadsheet
AI is applied to defined business workflows, not simply used as a general-purpose add-on: variance analysis, reconciliation, account-level investigation, ad hoc analysis, forecasting, exception management.
The main benefit isn’t just speed. Teams spend less time preparing and searching for information, and more time validating insights, testing scenarios, and deciding what to do next.
Planning context matters. AI becomes more useful when it can operate with the business definitions, hierarchies, scenarios, calculations, assumptions, and permissions that shape how an organization plans..
Trust is non-negotiable. Transparency, explainability, traceability, auditability, and human oversight underpin every story here — as Karndean’s Chris Brown put it, “I can always ask the Board Agent where an answer came from.”
Different planning problems benefit from different forms of AI. Board Agents support domain-specific analysis and use case driven agentic workflows, while Foresight and Signals bring predictive and external intelligence into forecasting.
AI supports Continuous Planning. Teams monitor changing conditions, understand their impact, and adjust plans and forecasts against current business reality.
From AI experimentation to confident decisions
AI in finance and planning is no longer limited to broad promises or isolated demos. These organizations are applying it to clearly defined planning and analysis workflows and evaluating its contribution to productivity, forecast quality, decision confidence, and business performance.
The common thread is context. AI becomes more useful when it operates with trusted business definitions, governed planning data, established calculations, and human oversight, rather than operating independently of the planning process.
Board combines domain-oriented AI agents, analytical AI, economic intelligence, and enterprise planning to help finance and operational teams continuously understand performance, evaluate options, and make confident, aligned decisions together.
Examples include AMMEGA uses the Board FP&A Agent for reconciliation and variance analysis, and Karndean is piloting the Board Controller Agent and FP&A Agent for consolidation and intercompany variance investigation. Chiesi, EBSCO Industries, and Diersch & Schröder Group are piloting the Board FP&A Agent (and, for Diersch & Schröder, AI-supported management analysis) for variance analysis and ad hoc financial analysis. Rocky Brands, Kraft Heinz, and Whataburger use Board Foresight (and, for Rocky Brands, Signals; for Whataburger, Board IBP) for demand, sales, and staffing forecasting.
The Board FP&A Agent supports financial variance analysis, root-cause identification, ad hoc analysis, reconciliation support, and other FP&A workflows through natural-language interaction grounded in governed planning and financial data.
The Board Controller Agent is an accounting-aware AI agent that supports financial close, consolidation, reconciliation, and reporting workflows for the Office of Finance. Karndean, for example, is piloting it to investigate consolidation issues and intercompany variances — moving from building report after report to asking a single question and getting a direct answer.
General-purpose AI can help users ask questions and analyze information, but enterprise planning requires additional context: planning hierarchies, scenarios, versions, calculations, assumptions, permissions, and workflows. Board AI operates within that planning environment, enabling AI-assisted analysis and decision support using governed business context rather than treating planning as a disconnected set of documents or data extracts.
Examples include reconciliation work cut from almost a full day to one or two hours at AMMEGA, intercompany variance investigation collapsed from report-after-report to a single question at Karndean, sales forecasts accurate within a 1–2% error margin at Whataburger, forecasting expanded from an initial pilot to Canada and 80+ international territories at Kraft Heinz, and variance drivers identified in seconds rather than hours at Chiesi.
Board for Demand Planning, together with Board Foresight and Signals, combines internal performance data with external market indicators to validate forecasts, explain what’s driving them, and support faster reforecasting — as shown in Rocky Brands’ story. Kraft Heinz uses the same kind of macroeconomic intelligence for go-to-market planning, and Whataburger uses Board Foresight as the base model for sales, wage, and staffing forecasts.