This website will offer limited functionality in this browser. We only support the recent versions of major browsers like Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge.

Intercompany Management Demo

View Full Video Script

6:29 min
  1. In this quick video, we will explore the intercompany management capability of the

  2. Board solution. Intercompany management refers to the ability to first

  3. match any kind of intercompany relationship across multiple

  4. legal entities within the same group, then reconcile any

  5. potential differences or discrepancies, and finally eliminate the

  6. intercompany balances at the consolidated level.

  7. With intercompany management in Board, we can considerably accelerate the closing

  8. process by resolving intercompany transaction discrepancies in a very

  9. collaborative way throughout the reconciliation process.

  10. We are also able to maintain a complete and transparent audit trail of

  11. any matched, unmatched, or automatically versus manually adjusted

  12. intercompany relationships. This boosts confidence in financial results

  13. and helps build audit defense. We do this by leveraging native accounting

  14. double entry-based logic that follows accounting principles in both local

  15. currency and transactional currency.

  16. This ensures compliance, feasibility, and consistency in the intercompany

  17. elimination process. Let's take a quick look at the core of intercompany

  18. management. The central feature in Board is the intercompany

  19. reconciliation cockpit. This cockpit serves both local users and global

  20. finance users.

  21. As a global finance user, we have a quick bird's eye view into the status of the

  22. overall intercompany reconciliation process across multiple

  23. declaring entities and trading partners.

  24. As the controller of a specific reporting unit, we can simply focus on our

  25. own declarations toward any trading partner.

  26. We can also see not only what we are declaring toward our trading partners, but

  27. also what the trading partners are declaring toward us.

  28. So for instance, if we are in charge of Spain, we have the ability to

  29. see all trading partners, not only what we have declared toward our trading

  30. partners, but also what the trading partners have declared toward us.

  31. By focusing on a specific relationship, for example, between

  32. Spain and Germany, it is possible to see that Spain has declared

  33. 2,300 euros toward Germany, and Germany has declared

  34. negative 2,300 euros, likely in accounts payables to

  35. Spain. In this specific relationship, we are only focusing on

  36. one intercompany elimination rule.

  37. However, in Board, we can have as many different intercompany elimination rules as

  38. needed for accounts receivables and payables, financial revenue and

  39. financial expenses, sales and expenses.

  40. These rules will appear in the reconciliation cockpit.

  41. For this specific relationship between Spain and Germany, we see that there is no

  42. unbalanced amount. The intercompany is fully balanced.

  43. We can also see the traffic light indicator, and at any point, we can always

  44. compare it to the legend to understand what each indicator

  45. means. Each intercompany rule is also subject to a

  46. threshold of tolerance, meaning a specific threshold above which the

  47. intercompany will be considered non-balanced, which also drives a specific

  48. behavior for the reconciliation.

  49. For this specific relationship, we can also observe the collaboration capabilities

  50. of Board.

  51. In this case, Spain has validated all its intercompany declarations towards

  52. its trading partners, but Germany has not validated its declarations

  53. towards Spain. If we remove the filter on Spain and focus on the relationship

  54. between Spain and Germany, we see that Spain has validated its

  55. intercompany transactions towards Germany, but Germany has not done the

  56. same. Just below, from Germany's perspective, the intercompany

  57. towards Spain still needs validation.

  58. At the same time, Germany can see that Spain has already validated its

  59. intercompany accounts, specifically accounts payables, with a

  60. negative and opposite sign, depending on the declaring entity.

  61. We can also notice yellow cells, which indicate that those cells are subject to

  62. commentary. Since the validation process has already been completed

  63. for Spain, Spain cannot enter comments at this stage.

  64. However, Germany can still add comments at any time.

  65. This is extremely helpful for fostering collaboration between the two entities,

  66. including the ability to share files and additional documentation.

  67. At any time, we can go into more detail.

  68. By simply drilling down, we can check the exact relationship between

  69. Germany and Spain. As shown, Germany has not validated its

  70. relationship towards Spain, and right below, we can see the exact accounts

  71. subject to the specific rule.

  72. In this case, receivables have been declared by both Spain and Germany,

  73. and this intercompany relationship is fully balanced.

  74. Of course, there could be thousands of intercompany transactions and eliminations

  75. within a group. Instead of manually reviewing each intercompany

  76. transaction, we can leverage Board AI to support the intercompany

  77. process and matching. The controller's agent can guide us to the specific

  78. intercompany situation. For example, our agent has

  79. several predefined prompts. By clicking on information and

  80. purposes, we can better understand the purpose of a specific

  81. reconciliation. The system then runs a full reconciliation,

  82. highlighting the issues, identifying the top five discrepancies, and

  83. potentially using AI to provide not only an overview of the matching or

  84. a detailed reconciliation analysis, but also making adjustment

  85. proposals. In Board, any intercompany transaction that is

  86. not naturally balanced can be adjusted either automatically or

  87. manually. If the discrepancy is within the threshold, it will

  88. be adjusted automatically. If it is above the threshold tolerance, it will

  89. require manual adjustment. To recap, today we have explored some of the

  90. main capabilities of intercompany management in Board.

  91. Board offers a native intercompany data model, which means there is no need for

  92. fake elimination entities, dedicated accounts, or mirrored

  93. elimination entities.

  94. All eliminations are performed at the entity level and can be rolled up at any

  95. level of the hierarchy as needed. These eliminations always follow

  96. a double entry logic where we charge and credit the specific accounts at the

  97. entity level. The intercompany process is highly

  98. collaborative with workflow and status monitoring that enables both the

  99. global finance team and people in the field to work together

  100. effectively throughout the intercompany process.

  101. The Board controller AI agent is also available to help us significantly reduce

  102. time and increase productivity by highlighting unmatched items,

  103. recommending resolutions, identifying anomalies, and suggesting the

  104. necessary adjustments to be performed.

Intercompany Management Demo

Explore how Board supports a faster, more controlled intercompany process within financial close and consolidation. Accounting-aware intelligence identifies meaningful mismatches, prioritizes the exceptions with the greatest impact and guides teams toward resolution, while governed workflows and audit trails preserve transparency and control—reducing manual investigation and strengthening confidence in consolidated results.