View Full Video Script
1:38 min
View Full Video Script
-
Our agents are built with explainability and reasoning inspection tools
-
baked in. So you can dig into each question to understand how it was
-
processed, and you can understand how the LLM was thinking about it.
-
So you can find how a certain answer was computed.
-
In the rare cases where we completely missed the mark, you can follow the path of
-
thoughts and pinpoint the layer that made the mistakes.
-
Did the agent call the wrong API, for example?
-
And in that case, it's usually an issue in the semantic layer.
-
It misunderstood that a certain dimension meant A, but instead it thought it would
-
mean B. Like for example, there was a missing or an ambiguous description.
-
Or in other cases, the instructions were unclear in the agent configuration.
-
Or in some other cases, the prompt of the user was unclear.
-
Or we can find out from the train of thoughts, the reasoning process, if the
-
calculation itself came out wrong because the planning model contains the mistake.
-
And in that case, that would be wrong also in the dashboard.
-
Then at that point, if the planning model, for example, has an aggregation that is
-
wrong or has a formula that is wrong, well, even if you have a pre-AI
-
dashboard or one of the traditional user interfaces, numbers would be wrong there
-
as well. And so through that explainability and reasoning inspection tools, we can
-
see, is the number coming out wrong from board?
-
Is the reasoning of the agent at fault?
-
So we have all those instrumentation to do the launch.