View Full Video Script
5:16 min
View Full Video Script
-
Intercompany reconciliation is often one of the most
-
time-consuming activities during financial close.
-
Controllers and corporate consolidation teams must identify
-
mismatches between reporting entities, understand
-
why they occurred, and determine which issues require
-
action before consolidation can be completed.
-
The Board controller agent dramatically reduces the effort
-
of intercompany reconciliation by analyzing
-
reconciliation data,
-
prioritizing the largest issues, and explaining the
-
likely root causes behind each imbalance.
-
In this example, we launch the Board controller agent
-
and confirm the reporting context.
-
The agent then verifies the reporting period, the scenario,
-
and currency before beginning its analysis.
-
This simple confirmation ensures that every
-
recommendation you receive is based on the correct
-
reporting data and provides the governance
-
expected in a controlled financial close
-
process. The first analysis provides an executive
-
summary of the organization's intercompany position.
-
Rather than requiring finance users to review hundreds or
-
thousands of reconciliation records, the Board controller
-
agent scans the entire intercompany reconciliation
-
cockpit in Board and immediately summarizes the
-
results. It highlights the overall balance sheet
-
and income statement imbalances, identifies the
-
largest reconciliation gaps, and prioritizes the
-
discrepancies that deserve immediate attention.
-
Within seconds, controllers have a clear picture of
-
where the biggest reconciliation risks exist in their
-
close process. Beyond simply listing
-
exceptions, the agent categorizes the most significant
-
discrepancies. It's distinguishing between missing
-
intercompany data,
-
known reconciliation differences, and other
-
unresolved items that require further
-
investigation.
-
Instead of manually searching through large reconciliation
-
reports, finance teams can immediately focus on the
-
exceptions with the greatest business impact
-
first. Once this high-level review is complete,
-
finance can now drill into a specific reporting
-
entity. In this example, we select Germany
-
because it contains several of the largest reconciliation
-
differences. The intercompany matching
-
detail analysis now performs a focused investigation
-
of Germany's outstanding intercompany balances,
-
explaining each mismatch individually and
-
suggesting the most likely root cause.
-
This is where the Board controller agent delivers the greatest
-
value. Instead of simply reporting that two companies are
-
out of balance, it's explaining why.
-
For example, the agent identifies situations where a
-
transaction was likely posted to different accounts by
-
each reporting entity, resulting in a small but
-
explainable mismatch.
-
It recognizes currency translation effects,
-
distinguishing legitimate foreign exchange differences from true
-
reconciliation issues. It also identifies
-
missing intercompany records where one side of the
-
transaction has not yet been reported.
-
And when there isn't enough evidence to determine the cause with
-
confidence, the Board controller agent classifies the
-
issue as residual, clearly indicating that additional
-
investigation is required rather than just making an
-
assumption. This transparency allows controllers
-
to trust the analysis while maintaining complete
-
control over the final accounting decisions.
-
Without Board AI, finance professionals often
-
review every reconciliation difference individually,
-
even though many represent known or easily
-
explained issues. The Board controller
-
agent handling intercompany reconciliation
-
performs that initial investigation for you
-
automatically, allowing users to focus only on the
-
exceptions that truly require your accounting judgment.
-
For controllers, this means less time reviewing
-
reconciliation reports, faster identification of
-
material issues, and quicker resolution of
-
intercompany differences across the group.
-
The result is a more efficient financial close,
-
improved collaboration between local and corporate finance
-
teams, and greater confidence that the intercompany balances have
-
been thoroughly analyzed before consolidation
-
continues.